April Fool’s Day (1986)

Synopsis: When Muffy St. John invited her college friends up to her parents’ secluded island home for the time of their lives, she just forgot to tell them it just might be the last time of their lives.

As soon as the kids arrive on the island, someone starts trimming the guest list… one murder at a time. And what starts out as a weekend of harmless “April Fool’s Day” pranks turns into a bloody battle for survival.

It’s just what you’d expect from the producer who brought you “Body Parts, Species and Friday the 13th- Parts III-V.”

April Fool’s Day (1986) 8.5

The advantage to being a long-time producer of a horror series like ‘Friday the 13th’ is that experience teaches you what works and what doesn’t. Frank Mancuso, jr. certainly knew what he was doing with ‘April Fool’s Day’: he brought the acclaimed director of ‘When a Stranger Calls’, a hot writer, and a young cast of up-and-comers together and planted the seeds of the next great horror franchise. jumping0050 Free Emoticons   Jumping

In using April Fools’ Day, an instantly recognizable day of mischief (not unlike a ridiculous, dressed down, cousin of All Hallow’s Eve) as its basis, the filmmakers were able to tap into the collective consciousness. It permitted them to immediately stir a sense of uncertainty, if not insecurity, in the viewing public’s mind – knowing full well that, on April 1st, anything could happen. And likely would! evilgrin0007 Free Emoticons   Evil

In so doing, they set the correct expectations for a successful horror film – especially one that would actually refuse to play by conventional rules. This gave the filmmakers license to take their willing audiences to the most sinister places that the heart can find and shock them with some of the most unexpected scares that could be designed by their masterful team of special effects artists (with the help of an exceptional cinematographer, of course!).

‘April Fool’s Day’ is an extremely effective horror film, worming its way into the mind slowly and leaving traces of itself well after the credits roll. The writing is superb: Danilo Bach was able to find the right balance between character development, fleshing out our group of young protagonists just enough to make them relatable, and visceral moments that, with all the torn flesh and horrifying screams, make quite an impression. happy0027 Free Emoticons   Happy

But it wouldn’t have amounted to much if the material hadn’t been supported by such a fine cast. While all were very young and only getting started, much talent is plastered on the screen (albeit, some in smaller roles or cameos): Patricia Arquette (‘True Romance’, TV’s ‘Medium’), Kevin Bacon (‘Footloose’, ‘Apollo 13’), Jennifer Connelly (‘Labyrinth’, ‘A Beautiful Mind’), Johnny Depp (TV’s ’21 Jump Street’, ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ series), Corey Feldman (‘Stand By Me’, ‘The Lost Boys’ trilogy) and Thomas F. Wilson (‘Back to the Future’ trilogy, TV’s ‘Gargoyles’). love0010 Free Emoticons   Love

happy0018 Free Emoticons   Happyhappy0018 Free Emoticons   Happyhappy0018 Free Emoticons   Happy !!!APRIL FOOLS!!! happy0018 Free Emoticons   Happyhappy0018 Free Emoticons   Happyhappy0018 Free Emoticons   Happy

As if ‘April Fool’s Day’ would be anything else but a standard, paint-by-numbers, ’80s horror flick! winking0002 Free Emoticons   Winking

(to think that this was remade a few years ago… shock)

And now for my real thoughts about this film:

April Fool’s Day (1986) 6.5

‘April Fool’s Day’ is a pretty poor film wrapped up in a great horror gimmick: that of a bunch of kids trapped on an island and being knocked off one by one on April Fools’ Day (note the actual spelling) – except that the film is a joke on its characters and, consequently, the audience. winking0002 Free Emoticons   Winking

This is what distinguishes it from all the other film of its ilk: the gimmick.

The problem is that, once we know the ending, the film loses much of its initial appeal – there’s no way to forget that it’s all a joke, which declaws the picture completely. Still, it does offer at least a second life for those who want to see how the filmmakers pulled it off without giving away their secret. happy0024 Free Emoticons   Happy

Watching it for the second time, after first seeing it some 25 years ago, I knew exactly what to expect. This time around, though, I decided to look out for the tricks, dissecting the skill with which they was rendered. I realized that, beyond the fact that the scares were uninspired bits that we’ve all seen before and could see coming a mile away, none of the “kills” were actually shown on screen – being only suggested or, worse, coming as a surprise. indifferent0004 Free Emoticons   Indifferent

For instance, I don’t actually remember Nan ever getting caught by our killer. However, the next thing that we know is that she is found floating in a well by Nikki and whatsisname. That was abrupt and anti-climactic, seeing as I didn’t even realize that she was in danger. Not that discovering her in the well was a shock, seeing as we couldn’t tell who it was whatsoever. confused

The direction and editing were choppy. Scenes often followed each other much like bumbling fools trying to squeeze their way through a doorway in a hurry and, instead of making it, tripping all over themselves; there was no attempt at allowing things to flow. And yet, 5 seconds of footage here and 10 seconds there would have helped immensely, making the film at least appear competent. rolleye0015 Free Emoticons   Rolling Eyes

The acting was appalling. You could see what these kids, presumably almost all non-actors, were trying to convey, but they had the dial way up and were incapable of natural performances. Case-in-point: there was this one scene where a guy was sighing so exuberantly that I couldn’t help but snicker when I should have been empathizing with his hurt feelings. happy0018 Free Emoticons   Happy

Likewise, the set-ups and dialog were uncomfortably contrived. I just couldn’t see real people saying and doing the things they did here, whether it was playing gags on each other or even doing something as simple as playing sports outside; somehow it all came off as fake.

As for the dialog… here’s a standard example from this film:

Harvey Edison, Jr.: I know you think I’m a hick, but I’d like to change your mind about that if you’d give me a chance.

Nikki Brashares: Why?

Harvey Edison, Jr.: Because I would really like to plow your field.

Whooooooo! What a zinger! (and quite the pick-up line, doncha think? Imma gonna hafta try it! tongue0024 Free Emoticons   Sticking Out Tongue)

Or how about this HILARIOUS one-liner:

Chaz Vyshinski: Hey guy, your fly is open and your Hostess Twinkie is hanging out.

FUN-nee!!! And clever, too: “guy” would naturally think that he hadn’t noticed that his dinglydoodad was hanging out. I mean, really! sad0020 Free Sad Emoticons


If I somewhat liked the film, it’s mostly because of its basic premise. The rest is pretty crap. Still, for the genre and era (mid-’80s), it’s not the worse thing ever. It’s actually amusing enough – especially if one knows the punchline ahead of time and has fun analysing it. happy0024 Free Emoticons   Happy

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s